The balanced scorecard and Baldrige framework explained

By Adam Niazi FCCA ยท Last updated 12 October 2026

The balanced scorecard (Kaplan and Norton, 1992) measures performance from four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth. It turns strategy into measures and targets. The Baldrige Excellence Framework is broader, assessing seven categories from leadership to results.

1Financial: howdo shareholderssee us?2Customer: how docustomers seeus?3Internalprocess: whatmust we excel4Learning andgrowth: can wekeep improving?
The balanced scorecard's four perspectives (Kaplan and Norton, 1992)

Example scorecard

For a heritage charity like Historic Places (March 2025 pre-seen):

PerspectiveObjectiveMeasureTarget
FinancialGrow unrestricted incomeCommercial income growth+8% a year
CustomerDelight visitorsVisitor satisfaction score90%+
Internal processEasy bookingShare of tickets booked online70%
Learning and growthSkilled, engaged volunteersVolunteer retention85%

The perspectives link: skilled volunteers (learning) improve visits (process), which raise satisfaction (customer), which grows income (financial). Kaplan and Norton call this a strategy map.

The Baldrige Excellence Framework

Chapter 3 of the book covers Baldrige. Its seven categories (current names; the book uses some earlier ones):

CategoryQuestion
LeadershipHow do leaders guide and sustain the organisation?
StrategyHow are strategic objectives set and put into action?
CustomersHow do we listen to and engage customers?
Measurement, analysis and knowledge managementHow do we use data and knowledge to improve?
WorkforceHow do we build an effective, engaged workforce?
OperationsHow do we design and improve work processes?
ResultsHow well are we performing in all these areas?

Source: NIST Baldrige Performance Excellence Program.

Balanced scorecard vs Baldrige

Balanced scorecardBaldrige
PurposeTurn strategy into measures and targetsAssess and improve the whole management system
Structure4 perspectives7 categories
OutputA set of KPIsStrengths and areas to improve
Best forTracking strategyOrganisation-wide improvement

In ACCA SBL

Performance measurement sits in syllabus areas C and H. A typical task: an organisation that measures only profit. Recommend measures in each perspective tied to its strategy and case facts, with targets, and explain how they link. Add benchmarking to set realistic targets.

Advantages

  • Balances financial and non-financial measures
  • Links measures to strategy
  • Shows cause and effect

Limitations

  • Too many measures can confuse
  • Measures can conflict
  • Ignores some stakeholders, such as suppliers and the community
  • Can encourage gaming of targets

FAQs

What are the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard?

Financial (how do we look to shareholders?), customer (how do customers see us?), internal business process (what must we excel at?) and learning and growth (how can we keep improving?).

Who created the balanced scorecard?

Robert Kaplan and David Norton, in a 1992 Harvard Business Review article. They later added strategy maps to show cause-and-effect links between the perspectives.

What is the Baldrige framework?

The Baldrige Excellence Framework, from the US Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, assesses an organisation across seven categories: leadership; strategy; customers; measurement, analysis and knowledge management; workforce; operations; and results.

What is the difference between the balanced scorecard and Baldrige?

The balanced scorecard is a measurement tool that turns strategy into targets in four perspectives. Baldrige is a broader self-assessment of how well the whole organisation is managed, with results as one of seven categories.

Is the balanced scorecard still relevant?

Yes. Many organisations, including public bodies and charities, use it or a variant, though often with fewer, sharper measures than early versions.

Get Chapter 3 free